Page 4

| page1 | page2 | page3 | page4 | page5 | page6 | page7 | page8 | page9 | page10 |

Perinatal Injuries: Fighting the Battle of Causation
By Vic Bergman

Perinatal means "around the time of birth," and perinatal injuries are those that occur to a fetus or newborn just before, during, or after birth. The vast majority of calls we get on such cases involve babies with central nervous system injuries that become apparent at or shortly after birth.

The "Causation" Conundrum

In our firm's experience representing injured children there have been many cases where we could persuasively prove that the health care provider was negligent, so that two of the three key elements of proof - negligence and injury - were clearly established.

ACOG's "Plausible Link" Criteria

ACOG suggests the following criteria must be present before a plausible link between perinatal asphyxia and neurologic injury can be made:
  1. Profound metabolic or mixed acidemia (pH less than 7.00) on an umbilical cord arterial blood sample, if obtained;
  2. Persistent Apgar score of 0-3 for longer than 5 minutes;
  3. Evidence of neonatal neurologic sequelae, eg, seizures, coma, hypotonia; and
  4. One or more of the following: cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hematologic, pulmonary, or renal system dysfunction.

 

It is frequently the third element - "causation" - that makes these cases risky, complicated and extremely expensive. In cases of brain injured infants, proof of a cause-in-fact relationship between the health care provider's negligence and the neurologic injury (commonly including cerebral palsy), is always a challenge for both sides. Plaintiff's counsel must establish the causal link between the negligence and the injury, and defense counsel will attempt to disprove or cast doubt on that link by offering alternative causation explanations and possibilities. A common scenario is an infant diagnosed with cerebral palsy following a labor in which the fetal heart monitor recording shows one of the classic fetal heart rate patterns that call for possible intervention (i.e., decreased variability, repetitive late decelerations, prolonged variable decelerations, sinusoidal rhythm, tachycardia, or bradycardia), but where the labor is allowed to progress too long, resulting in oxygen deprivation (hypoxia/ ischemia /asphyxia) to the fetus. Another common scenario is the post-delivery failure of the nurse practitioner, pediatrician, or neonatologist to adequately resuscitate a severely depressed newborn so that the oxygen deprivation continues and, presumably, injury is the result.

The "Other Cause(s)" Defense

Defense counsel often say that there was some pre-existing injury, completed before labor ever began, which was the very reason the fetus exhibited the abnormal fetal heart pattern in the first place.

Even if the defendant was negligent, the argument goes, it did not make any difference because the outcome could not have been changed even with the best of care. To support this position the defendant will point out that 90% of all children with cerebral palsy were not asphyxiated during labor or delivery, and that most children who sustain hypoxia during labor or delivery do not have cerebral palsy or neurologic injury. Defense counsel can argue with a considerable weight of medical evidence that even where both asphyxiation during labor and cerebral palsy are seen together in the same child, that does not establish a cause-in-fact relationship between the two.

In many cases, when one reviews the medical records, a number of risk factors for cerebral palsy may be found, all of which are candidates for the "other cause" defense. Some of these include maternal mental retardation, maternal albuminuria during pregnancy, maternal diabetes, maternal infections (which are often not detectable clinically), breech presentation, inborn metabolic disorders, prematurity, genetic defects, drug abuse or effects, intrauterine growth retardation, injury from maternal trauma, meconium aspiration in utero, trauma from appropriate or inappropriate use of forceps, inadequate resuscitation after delivery, newborn infection, blood disorders, and others. Defense experts will usually point out that the most common cause of cerebral palsy is "idiopathic," meaning medical science just does not know the cause. Experts for obstetrician-



| page1 | page2 | page3 | page4 | page5 | page6 | page7 | page8 | page9 | page10 |