Uterine Rupture Leaves
Baby Catastrophically Injured
Tragic Example of the Danger of Vaginal Birth after Previous
Cesarean Section and Use of Oxytocin.
Two Kansas City area obstetricians, their professional
corporation, and a Kansas City Metropolitan hospital, recently
settled the claims of Trevor (last name withheld), age three and
a half, and his parents, for a total of $6,400,000. $3,400,000
was paid on behalf of the obstetricians and their professional
corporation, and $3,000,000 on behalf of the hospital. Victor
Bergman and Steve Six handled the case on behalf of Trevor and
his family.
This was the second pregnancy for Trevor's mother,
whose first pregnancy resulted in a cesarean section for failure
to progress. The mother testified that when she became pregnant
again with Trevor, she strongly desired to have a repeat cesarean
section, but defendant obstetrician #1 pushed hard in favor
of a vaginal delivery after cesarean birth (VBAC), advising
that a cesarean section could not be done unless there was a
specific medical justification, which there was not. The pregnancy
proceeded uneventfully until the mother's water broke and irregular
contractions began in the early morning hours of April 5, 1995,
when she was advised to go to the hospital. Obstetrician #1
ordered pitocin (oxytocin), which was started at 10:15 a.m.,
in an attempt to augment the progress of labor. The order to
the nurse was to increase the pitocin slowly "until an adequate
labor pattern is established." Obstetrician #1 made arrangements
for a partner to see the mother between 11:00 a.m. and noon
to install an internal uterine pressure catheter but he failed
to appear. The internal monitor is the only way to determine
the true duration, frequency, strength, and tone of the uterus
and its contractions. In a woman with a scarred uterus from
a previous cesarean section, such internal monitoring is important
to avoid hyperstimulation and hypertonicity of the uterus, both
of which increase the risk for rupture of the uterus and injury
to the mother and/or fetus. As the labor progressed, and the
nurse increased the amount of pitocin, the external uterine
contraction monitoring was suggestive of hyperstimulation, but
this went unappreciated by the nurse.
Continued on Page
8