TOYOTA CRASHWORTHINESS
CASE SETTLED
A four-week jury trial in Great Falls, Montana was averted after
Toyota Motor Corporation agreed to settle a products liability action
brought against the company in which our firm alleged that the 1987
Toyota 4Runner has an unreasonable propensity to roll over in foreseeable
driving maneuvers. Despite a wealth of information about the rollover
propensity of sport utility vehicles like the CJ Jeeps, the Suzuki
Samurai and the Ford Bronco II, Toyota introduced the 4Runner in
1984. The 4Runner was apparently rushed into production to compete
with the Chevrolet Blazer, Jeep Cherokee and Ford Bronco and Explorer.
After accurately modeling the 1987 4Runner's vehicle characteristics,
the steering and braking inputs of our client and the terrain
at the accident scene, a computer simulation was developed resulting
in a video animation which demonstrated that the 1987 Toyota 4Runner
was defective in design which caused the vehicle to have an unreasonable
propensity to roll over in foreseeable driving manuevers. We then
modeled the 1996 Toyota 4Runner's vehicle characteristics (redesigned
by Toyota for better stability) and ran it through the accident
scene terrain and again duplicated the driver's steering and braking
inputs. The 1996 4Runner did not roll over; it merely spun out.
Finally, we made minor modifications to the 1987 4Runner's design
and again ran the vehicle through the accident sequence. Like
the redesigned 1996 4Runner, the modified 1987 4Runner did not
roll over, demonstrating that minor modifications to the vehicle
would have prevented the accident.
Continued on page 3
|
Welcome
We are glad to present a new issue of our newsletter after a
longer than anticipated break since the last issue.
In this issue we feature case reports on noteworthy verdicts
for two delightful senior citizens, a settlement in a crashworthiness
case, and two important appellate cases handled by the firm, one
in the Tenth Circuit and one before the Kansas Supreme Court.
In This Issue:
|